🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in detailing its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the maps created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision occurs during a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party officials lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior House figure argued the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.